๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ.
- Feb 12
- 1 min read
Letโs be honest: itโs not โjust youโ.
๐ฏ๐ฌ% of people involved in negotiations admit theyโre afraid their offer will be seen as shocking or disrespectful.
So what do they do?
They soften.
They wait for the other side.
They hide behind โletโs see your proposal firstโ.
And then they complain that suppliers or internal stakeholders โalways anchor too high / ask for too muchโ.
Of course they do. You gifted them the steering wheel.
๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ก๐๐ญ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐โ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก ๐
The fear of the โoffensive offerโ is rarely about ethics.
Most of the time, itโs about ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฐ and ๐ง๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ซ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ.
But you donโt have to choose between:
โ being brutally direct
or
โ disappearing behind vague, useless sentences
There is a third path: testing your proposals with indirect โ๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ช๐งโฆโ questions.
This is exactly what the CANOESยฉ technique we used at inness does:
using โWhat ifโฆโ to manage counterproposals, add value, say no, and handle potentially offensive offers without burning the relationship.
Instead of saying:
โOur price is XXX. Take it or leave it.โ
You can say:
๐ โWhat if we could not agree to your proposal, what would the consequences be?โ
๐ โWhat if I told you that, in theory, our price was XXX, how would you react?โ



Comments