top of page

๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป โ€” ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ถฬˆ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ

  • Feb 12
  • 2 min read

โ€œTrust is earned in drops and lost in buckets.โ€

But hereโ€™s what I see in real negotiations ๐Ÿ‘‡

Most buyers swing between two extremes:

  • ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ trust: โ€œWeโ€™ve known them for years, itโ€™ll be fine.โ€

  • ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ control: โ€œIf itโ€™s not in the contract, I donโ€™t believe it.โ€


Both kill value.

The best negotiators I work with donโ€™t โ€œhopeโ€ for trust.


They ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ it, step by step, like a process.


Hereโ€™s how they do it ๐Ÿ‘‡


1๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜

  • Not huge concessions.

  • Just controlled risks: sharing a bit more context, being transparent on priorities, or giving a small flexibility before asking for one.

  • It signals: โ€œIโ€™m willing to work with you, not against you.โ€

  • Reciprocity kicks in โ€“ and trust starts to move.


2๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜†

Suppliers open up when they donโ€™t fear being punished for telling the truth.

That means separating the person from the problem, acknowledging constraints on both sides, and showing that โ€œbad news earlyโ€ is safer than โ€œbad news hiddenโ€.

Without that safety, information stays locked โ€” and you negotiate in the dark


3๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜†

Trust isnโ€™t built on big speeches.


Itโ€™s built when:

  • you show up prepared, every time

  • you keep your microโ€‘commitments (not just the big ones)

  • your behavior stays consistent, even under pressure


Over a few cycles, your counterpart starts to think: โ€œWhen they say yes, it means yes.โ€


4๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ

Instead of just saying โ€œThis is our policyโ€, they explain:

  • how decisions are made

  • which constraints are nonโ€‘negotiable

  • where they still have room to maneuver

When your reasoning is transparent, even a โ€œnoโ€ can strengthen trust โ€” because it feels honest, not political.


5๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ณ๐—ณ๐˜€

They donโ€™t sign and disappear.

They set joint milestones, reviews, and โ€œcourseโ€‘correctionโ€ moments right into the deal.

This does two things:

  • it reassures both sides (โ€œWe wonโ€™t be stuck if things changeโ€)

  • it turns trust into a loop: each successful checkpoint reinforces the next one.


6๏ธโƒฃ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฒ

Internal stakeholders often want โ€œmaximum squeezeโ€.

Smart negotiators translate that pressure into clear objectives โ€” without turning the supplier into an enemy.


They know that destroying trust today is the fastest way to destroy value tomorrow.

This is where many teams get it wrong:


They invest hours in clauses and almost no time in consciously building trust.

So let me ask you a direct question:


๐Ÿ‘‰ ๐—œ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ผ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ: ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—นโ€ฆ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜?


Youโ€™ve seen this in real life โ€” where do you see the bigger damage?


ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page